Alexandra Peltz

Zarek Brot-Goldberg awarded the 2019 Richard M. Scheffler Prize in Health Economics

Zarek Brot-Goldberg is the recipient of this year’s Richard M. Scheffler Prize in Health Economics. He is being recognized for his PhD thesis in health economics. During the 2019-2020 academic year, he will be a postdoctoral associate at the Tobin Center for Economic Policy at Yale. The following year, he will be an assistant professor at the Harris School of Public Policy at the University of Chicago.

Please consider making a tax-deductible contribution to the Scheffler Health Economics Award Fund, as this award will be a tribute to Dr. Scheffler for his many contributions to Berkeley and will enable the PhD program to highlight the research excellence in health economics and policy. If you are able to contribute to the dissertation award fund, please either mail a check to University of California, Berkeley Foundation and note “The Scheffler Health Economics Award Fund” or you can click here to be directed to the secure donation website.

Professor Richard Scheffler presents as part of a UC Berkeley panel on anxiety disorder

Professor Scheffler spoke about a recent study finding an increase in anxiety disorder among college students. He presented these findings as part of “A Generation Under Pressure: Talking Mental Health at UC Berkeley,” an event hosted by the Berkeley Institute for the Future of Young Americans as part of the Goldman School of Public Policy on April 18th.

Professor Richard Scheffler Interviewed on KCBS

On April 20th, Professor Scheffler was interviewed on KCBS Radio regarding a recent study describing the dramatic uptick in anxiety disorder among millennials. The study found the increase in anxiety disorder to be associated with financial strain and increased screen time on social networks.

To listen to the interview, click here

Petris Center Study Featured in San Francisco Chronicle

A study describing the rise of anxiety disorder in college students was highlighted in the San Francisco Chronicle on April 18th. The Petris Center study found that increasing rates of anxiety are correlated with increased tech and social media use, as well as financial struggles. Anxiety has grown faster than other mental health problems, such as depression. In 2016, 1 in 5 students on campus were diagnosed with anxiety disorder, with only 1 in 10 in 2008. This study points to an urgency to address anxiety in millennials, on campus and off.

To read the article, click here

Petris Center Director Richard Scheffer at UCI 2019 Health Care Forecast Conference

Distinguished Professor Emeritus Richard Scheffler gave a presentation during the “Strategic Outlook on the Health Care Market” session as part of the UCI Health Care Forecast Conference on March 11, 2019. Scheffler focused on healthcare consolidation, mainly centered on current trends in hospital consolidation and the impact on prices in California. HHI (a measure of consolidation) and hospital prices demonstrate a positive correlation among California counties. Scheffler also touches on “large” vertical mergers including CVS-Aetna and Cigna-Express Scripts.

Petris Center Report Included in California Health Care Foundation Blog

Consolidation in California’s Health Care Market 2010-2016:
Impact on Prices and ACA Premiums,” a paper published by the Petris Center in 2018 was featured in a CHCF Blog Post on March 1, 2019. The post, titled “The Price Isn’t Right,” included this report as evidence supporting consolidation leading to higher prices. The report found that 44 of California’s 58 counties have highly concentrated hospital markets and six others have moderately concentrated hospital markets. The Petris Center has continued to study consolidation and its impact on prices.

Read the full blog post here.

Read the report here.

Petris Center Letter-to-the-Editor Included in New York Times “Fixing Our Health Care System” Opinion Piece

Richard Scheffler and Steven Shortell’s letter-to-the-editor and paper “The Seven Percent Solution: Costing and Financing Universal Health Coverage in California” was featured in a February 24th opinion piece in the New York Times. The letter addresses the possibility to implement universal care in California via a public/private model. Given that Medicare-for-All will be in the spotlight during the 2020 election, it is important to consider alternatives to achieving universal coverage.

To see the full letter, click here

Petris Center White Paper Proposes Plan to Achieve Universal Coverage in California and Strategies to Contain Growing Healthcare Costs

Health Affairs published a blog post on February 8th describing the a new paper by the Petris Center. The paper “proposes an alternative path to move California towards universal coverage using a two-pronged approach: controlling high health care costs and employing novel sources of financing for universal coverage. This plan would provide health coverage to 3.55 million uninsured Californians, including low-income and undocumented persons, as well as those who receive only partial Medicaid benefits in line with the definition of insured used by the Congressional Budget Office. The key element of this approach is the use of risk-based capitated care delivery models.”

The blog post can be read here

The full paper can be accessed here

Petris Center Analysis Featured In Wall Street Journal Article

In a December 27th article published in the Wall Street Journal, the Petris Center contributed an analysis demonstrating the growing trends for physicians being employed by hospitals rather than by medical groups or independent practices, seen in a graphic in the article. The article provides insight into the increasingly higher costs of care when provided by a hospital group as compared to a doctor’s office. It also points to doctors referring their patients to hospitals that they are affiliated with, despite the higher costs for not only the insurer, but in out-of-pocket costs for patients. This article describes the growing trend of hospital acquisitions of physician groups and the resulting increase in prices for patients, but it mainly focuses on the knowledge asymmetry of doctors referring patients to a more expensive option they are affiliated with and often times are “required” by their employer to recommend.

Read the full article here

Health Affairs article by Brent D. Fulton, Petris Center, UC Berkeley